Thursday, August 27, 2020

Microeconomics Additional Cost Charge

Question: Portray about the Microeconomics for Additional Cost Charge. Answer: 1. Business travelers are less touchy to cost. This permits the aircrafts the possible chance to charge extra expenses emerging from the cost based strategy instruments to the travelers (Brons et al., 2002). The business travelers can, subsequently, be charged more than the relative without diminishing the interest. This clarifies why the assessed versatility of interest (0.4) for transoceanic air travel in business class is not as much as that of the economy class at 0.62. This demonstrates with a slight change in cost for the economy class which is profoundly delicate to value, there will be a greater change sought after subsequently the higher versatility for economy class than business class. 2. A slant of a straight-line request with a steady slant has continually adjusting flexibility. The deliberate flexibility expanded as one climbs the interest bend to more significant expenses and lower amounts (Bass, 2010). The clarification depends on idea of flexibility itself that is rate change-based (measure of progress and beginning stage of the change). Since the slant is fixed, unit change is indistinguishable for singular fragment on the bend yet the base qualities are evolving. References Bass, F. M. (2010). The connection between dispersion rates, experience bends, and request versatilities for customer tough mechanical developments. Diary of Business, S51-S67. Brons, M., Pels, E., Nijkamp, P., Rietveld, P. (2002). Value versatilities of interest for traveler air travel: a meta-examination. Diary of Air Transport Management, 8(3), 165-175.

Saturday, August 22, 2020

Capital Punishment Essays (570 words) - Penology, Criminal Justice

The death penalty When turning on the TV, radio, or basically perusing the neighborhood paper, one is overpowered with updates on captures, murders, crimes, sequential executioners, and different genuine wrongdoings. It is uncommon not to experience a day in this world and not know about these things. In any case, some administration authorities in our nation appear to be a piece unsure about what steps to take so as to limit the activities of genuine or on the other hand potential guilty parties. Not exclusively is it carrying out a wrongdoing, yet in addition today, it is finishing ones life, either genuinely or in a jail cell. This is a hazard one is taking when he chooses to cut somebody with a blade or pull a trigger, however is it truly up to our equity framework to choose one's destiny? There are numerous issues that address this inquiry of the death penalty, for example, religion, the impact on society, compensation being denied, the conceivable wrongly charged, and the privileges of the indicted. Be that as it may, how frequently do these ideas creep into the publics mind when it knows about our reasonable and trusty government removing somebody's breathing rights? The book of scriptures states, Thou will not execute, what's more, this being a transgression ought to must be rectified inside oneself. On the other hand, it additionally states, Don't pass judgment on others individual feelings. It is an administration's obligation to rebuff individuals that ignore the law to keep the world all together, however is it their entitlement to remove their lives? It is a Christian's duty to call attention to the individuals who sin that they do as such and this nation, confiding in God as it says it does, ought to do only that. A few individuals feel that compensation is conceded when one is condemned until the very end punishment. In any case, if a friend or family member is killed and his family feels equity in having the killer experience the equivalent, is it not thought about similarly off-base? Excusing and overlooking are totally impossible, however one ought to think about the idea of disappointment and regret. Similarly as one feels horrendous when unjustly passes through their neighbors yard, without a doubt a killer may feel the same. One is just human and nobody can anticipate any more. A misstep is a slip-up, regardless of whom it might hurt or what devastation it might cause. There's consistently the possibility of the honest being in an unlucky spot. A bunch of proof from a solid legal advisor could condemn somebody to life in jail, and even capital punishment. One could be going through and finishing his time on earth in imprisonment for basically strolling down an inappropriate road on an inappropriate day. Should he need to serve the time that is not legitimately his and take the needle that shouldn't prick his skin? It's a little flaw in the equity framework that isn't anything but difficult to survive, yet such's somebody's reality, and not realizing reality could be crushing. Abraham Lincoln proclaimed, All men are made equivalent. This announcement of truth has clearly been kept separate from thought in the court. Everybody merits another opportunity since they are for the most part equipped for reorganization. The guilty party ought to get the opportunity to return into the world and substantiate himself respectable. In the event that understanding debasement with unethical behavior is the world's solution for compromise, at that point why not hack off the criminal's hand? An eye for an eye was the equity of the past. It is currently an advanced world dependent on rationale also, change. Should an administration carry out a wrongdoing to legitimize another? In the event that the death penalty was exclusively founded on rebuffing the miscreants, there would be nobody left to infuse the needle or pull the switch on.

Friday, August 21, 2020

Types of Sexual Minorities and Characteristics

Types of Sexual Minorities and Characteristics Relationships LGBTQ Print What Sexual Minority Means By Elizabeth Hartney, BSc., MSc., MA, PhD Elizabeth Hartney, BSc, MSc, MA, PhD is a psychologist, professor, and Director of the Centre for Health Leadership and Research at Royal Roads University, Canada. Learn about our editorial policy Elizabeth Hartney, BSc., MSc., MA, PhD Updated on July 18, 2018 Vesnaandjic / Getty Images More in Relationships LGBTQ Spouses & Partners Violence and Abuse Sexual minorities are groups of people whose sexual orientation, gender identity, or sexual characteristics are different from the presumed majority of the population, which are male or female heterosexuals. Sexual Orientation The most common use of the term sexual minority is to refer to people whose sexual orientation is not heterosexual. This include people who are homosexual, including gay menâ€"men who are sexually attracted to and/or have sex with men and not women, and lesbiansâ€"women who are sexually attracted to and/or have sex with women and not men; and bisexualsâ€"men and women who are sexually attracted to and/or have sex with both men and women, and heteroflexible people. Some men who identify as gay and some women who identify as lesbian as well as men and women who identify as bisexual describe their orientation as an affiliation with a gay, lesbian or bisexual identity, regardless of sexual activity or even sexual desire. Both men and women may identify as queer rather than gay, although some lesbians and gay men are still offended by the term queer. Another sexual minority is men who have sex with men or MSM for short. These men do not always identify themselves as gay, bisexual, or queer. While people of all sexual orientations may consider themselves authorities on the sexual identities of othersâ€"some even bragging about the accuracy of their gaydarâ€"no one can truly know the feelings of another person, and no one has the right to judge the sexual orientation of another person. Therefore, the sexual identity of another person is entirely for them to decide and disclose, as they feel appropriate. Because of the complexity of sexual feelings, what each person decides may change at different times of their life. Some people whose sexual orientation changes or who are attracted to a wide range of people regardless of gender describe themselves as pansexual while some whose identity is only minimally associated with their sexual orientation describe themselves as asexual. Gender Identity and Sexual Characteristics Sexual minorities also include transgender individualsâ€"men and women who identify themselves as the opposite gender whether or not they have undergone any kind of gender re-assignment and people with intersex characteristics, previously termed hermaphrodite, who are born with or develop anatomical sexual characteristics that are neither typically male nor typically female, or who have what appears to be a combination of male and female characteristics. They may or may not choose to have surgery and/or other treatments to assign a male or female identity, and they may or may not have had the choice in this matter if a gender identity was assigned to them in infancy. Some people who reject the notion of a gender binary, that is, they do not believe everyone should be assigned to the male or female gender, or strongly feel a sense of affiliation with both male and female gender characteristics. They may refer to their gender identity as gender fluid, genderqueer, or non-binary genders . Not All Sexual Minorities Are Included As a politically correct term, sexual minority generally refers to groups of peoples sexual orientation or identity within relatively socially acceptable limitsâ€"meaning, people who have sexual identities related to legal sexual activities between consenting adults. The term is not generally acceptable in reference to sex addiction, polygamy, child sexual abuse, or paraphilias, although increasingly, the polyamorous community is gaining acceptance as a sexual minority. Substance Use and Addiction Risks in Sexual Minorities While some sexual minorities are more prevalent than others, being part of a sexual minority appears to increase the risk of substance use problems and addictions. However, research has mostly focused on gay men, particularly the party and play phenomenon, and the association of gay men with substance use has lead to myths about gay meth use. Although the research is far from conclusive, it seems plausible that the increased stress of being part of a sexual minority, rather than anything implicit to sexual orientation or sexual identity, is the cause of this increased risk.

Monday, May 25, 2020

Social Sites Virtual Playgrounds or Predatory Hunting...

Social interaction via internet has become a raving craze, but the debate of online safety measures necessary for children using social sites has become a hot topic of discussion. Social sites open the door to online interaction with friends, relatives, and classmates; but they also enhance the risk of interaction with online predators. Representative Michael Fitzpatrick, from Pennsylvania, is a sponsor of the Deleting Online Predators Act. He is an advocate for extreme online restrictions for children who use social-networking sites. On the other hand, Henry Jenkins, the director for the Comparative Media Studies program at Massachusetts Institute of Technology believes that technology is a crucial part of society’s demand of social†¦show more content†¦The act would also require the making of a website that would be a resource for teachers, parents, and children to help them become more aware of the potential dangers of the internet. Fitzpatrick’s main concer n is for the safety of young users of these social-networking sites; therefore, to protect young users from the dangers of social sites, he introduced stringent protective restrictions in his proposed Deleting Online Predator Act. Henry Jenkins states that society is at a â€Å"moment of transition.† He defends his position of encouraging the use of social sites, by pointing out that networking skills are becoming more and more important in all aspects of life. He argues that even teachers are beginning to take advantage of the world of technology by using the internet to post information about homework on blogs; they also use e-mail to send out information to students and parents to help keep them updated on current and upcoming notifications dealing with school. He debates that the bills presented to restrict social network access from public schools and libraries, such as Fitzpatrick’s proposed Deleting Online Predator Act, would definitely limit the access some students would have to these agents of the classroom and may preclude advancement due to lack of access of certain educational, online resources. In his concern for child safety on social sites, Jenkins comments, â€Å"just as youth in a hunting society play with bows andShow MoreRelatedBusiness in Singapore30736 Words   |  123 Pages Singapore has started wiring up the Next Generation Nationwide Broadband Network (Next Gen NBN) and is targeting to complete by 2012. The Next Gen NBN is Singapore’s nation-wide ultra-high speed fibre network. A strategic enabler of economic and social growth, the network will prepare Singapore for an infocomm-enabled future and place it at the forefront of broadband development internationally. e. Singapore Connectivity Within the 7-hour of flying time, Singapore has access to 3.1 billion of

Thursday, May 14, 2020

Midterm Elections Midterm Election - 1665 Words

Midterm Election Race Historically, the U.S. midterm elections are typically a reflection of the effectiveness and popularity of the incumbent president. Invariably, the party that does not control the White House is usually in favor of winning the midterm elections, with very few exceptions. For example, in the 1986 elections, President Reagan was convinced that Republicans would maintain a majority in the House of Representatives. However, voters overwhelmingly chose the Democrats who took control of the U.S. Senate. President Clinton had a similar experience in an election that was nicknamed the ‘Republican Revolution’ in which the Grand Old Party (GOP) took over most of the gubernatorial posts, the Senate and House of Representatives. In the last century, only three incumbent parties were able to retain control of the House in 1934, 1998 and 2002. History shows that people’s perception of the presidency has a direct bearing on his party’s success at the mid-term elections (J acobson, 2012). The November 4, 2014 election is no different form the norm and will be a reflection of Americans’ perception and sentiments about President Barack Obama’s two-term leadership. Less than 40 percent of Americans approve of the president’s performance in the build up to the 2014 midterm election. As Republicans vote in the upcoming elections, their vote is less about electing the best representatives and senators but more about voting Obama out. The slow pace of economic recoveryShow MoreRelatedMidterm Elections : Midterm Election1328 Words   |  6 PagesAnalysis of The Midterm Elections The 2014 midterm election was by far one of the most astounding ones, which resulted in a sweep by the Republican party. The Midterm elections in the United States refer to general elections in the United States that are held two years after the quadrennial (four-year) elections for the President of the United States (Oxford dictionary). This is done every two years to ensure that one specific seat holder does not get too comfortable and start to exercise hisRead MoreThe Midterm Election Of Texas1128 Words   |  5 PagesThe midterm elections in Texas were something very big this year. This year was the year that the current governor, Rick Perry, would not seek a fourth term. Greg Abbott, real name, Gregory Wayne Abbott, won the midterm election for governor and will take office in January 20, 2015. Greg Abbott was born in the city of Wichita Falls in the state of Texas, he went to college in the University of Texas at Austin; in this college he earned a bachelor of business administration in finance. Three yearsRead MoreCandidates And Policy Of The United States Senate Elections906 Words   |  4 Pagesarticle titled Candidates and Policy in the United States Senate Elections are Gerald C. Wright and Michael B. Berkman. Although the previous literature on the subject suggests, that policy is not a major factor in the decision-making process, the article argued otherwise. It is a known fact that a substantial policy difference between the candidates in a particular race exists. Policymakers write specific policies for the future and an election determines who will write the policies, which decides theRead MoreAp Us Government : Free Response Essay905 Words   |  4 Pagesthere was not much change in the results of elections or government policy because women tended to vote in a similar manner as their spouses. The Pew Research Center for the People and the Press shows that there is a currently a gender gap whereby women vote differently on certain issues than men. Women tend to vote for issues such as universal health care and gay marriage. In addition, women tend to vote with the democratic party as seen in the 2008 election when 56% of women voters voted democrat andRead MoreGeorgia Case Analysis1682 Words   |  7 PagesGeorgia is a state that has a political history that is very similar to many of its southern neighbors. The state succeeded duri ng the Civil War and the election of Abraham Lincoln in 1860. During the period of Reconstruction, the state was forced to have two Republican Governors, but once regular elections returned in 1872 the state has seen an unprecedent streak of democratic governors. Not until 2003 did a Republican Governor reign over the state since Reconstruction. While many other southernRead MoreThe Politics Of The United States1434 Words   |  6 PagesIn the United States, elections can be the deciding factor in ones political career. In recent times, congressional elections have not only become increasingly important, but also more expensive. The expense is often considered a result of modern times, however it results in many people being unable to run for a political position. This begs the question of who might be running for a political position if the price wasn t so high, would it be a more common person who relates more to the people.Read MoreThe Obamacare A Kind Of Social Insurance Poli cy1540 Words   |  7 Pagesin terms of congress. However, this kind of limitation made the deadlock comes out. Greenberg (2004) points out that the way to break the deadlock is to win the election and create a sustainable majority. As the congress out of democrat’s control, if they want to break the deadlock, they need to deal with the republican or win it by election. Just like ‘Obamacare’ the social insurance policy by president Obama. In the other situation, when the gridlock came, it means no parties can make a politicalRead MoreDepartment Of Nutrition Essay1480 Words   |  6 Pagesdistrict system. The President is elected for a four year term, that includes two elections of the House. The President reflects the will of the American people at the start of their term. However, the results of the midterm election shows a change in the will of the people. The midterm election allows for a refresh within the House that reflects the constant changing of the American people. The House shifted at midterm elections to the opposing party of the President, which hints at disapproval of her policiesRead MoreThe Election Of President Obama847 Words   |  4 Pageswhatever term you want but following Tuesday s epic win by the Republicans in the midterms one thing is clear: politics in America has changed. What is not yet clear is if that change is something that is permanent or just a fleeting fancy that will stabilize in two years. Democrats surely hope that Tuesday night was not a sign of a changing electorate but a sign of what happens to a president s party in a midterm election. If they believe that, if they approach recovering from this defeat as such,Read MoreGubernatorial And Presidential Races1423 Words   |  6 Pagesfederal level? I am particularly looking at the differences between Gubernatorial and Presidential races in the time frame of 1980 to 2016. Despite our hyper partisan political climate, there are numerous examples of states who in the most recent election voted heavily for Hillary Clinton (Maryland, Massachusetts, Vermont) or Donald Trump (Montana, Louisiana) who have governors of the opposite party who are in power and popular. Over the course of my reading I encountered several explanations as to

Wednesday, May 6, 2020

Control And Its Effects On The Choices People And...

There are many variables that directly and indirectly impact the choices people and individuals make. These complex connections make tracing patterns of behavior and decision-making complicated. The information I’ve learned, digested and applied is relevant, important and I would argue, earth-shattering. Sharing this information with others is complex; with many attitudes and priorities already made before discussions happen. I think this is one of the complicated things about teaching issues regarding the environment--some students don’t form their own opinions after learning and discussions. Instead, they walk in with their parents’ opinions and remain closed to thinking differently or reevaluating their thoughts. Scare tactics can†¦show more content†¦For example, Rachel Carson faced financial challenges her entire career as she cared for family members and worked to pay for college. Despite these challenges, she raised alarms on multiple environmental issues creating change that has permeated world-wide. Students connect with these environmental leaders and the lives they have led in positive ways. Another key part regarding role-models is that there are so many from multiple cultures and genders. I feel that there is strong cultural representation in these environmental leaders; therefore, students can connect with someone their age, someone from their culture or someone completely different. Personally, I have grown from the content of this class. With the holiday season coming up, I’ve thought a great detail about the commercialization of everything. I am focusing on consuming less, purchasing less and being more creative about â€Å"what I think I need.† Americans spend $882 on average for holiday shopping (2015, 2015). Even though $882 is beyond our holiday budget, it brings to light consumerism as an epidemic for many Americans. In a survey from the Center of the New American Dream, 70% Americans would welcome a smaller focus on gift-giving (Simplify, n.d.). My concerns grow beyond just purchasing things. â€Å"From Thanksgiving to New Year s Day, household waste increases by more than 25%. Added food waste, shopping bags, packaging, wrapping paper, bows and ribbons all add up to an additional 1 million

Tuesday, May 5, 2020

The Supreme Court System Essay Example For Students

The Supreme Court System Essay The Supreme Court SystemThe justices determine which cases to take. They never explain the reason for their choices. Whether or not a case is accepted strikes me as a rather subjective decision, made up in part of intuition and in part of legal judgment, Rehnquist wrote in The Supreme Court: How It Was, How It Is, his 1987 book about the court. Important factors, he said, are whether the legal question has been decided differently by two lower courts and needs resolution by the high court, whether a lower-court decision conflicts with an existing Supreme Court ruling and whether the issue could have significance beyond the two parties in the case. For example, the justices likely accepted the sexual-harassment case brought by Paula Jones, a former Arkansas state employee, against President Clinton because it will test the important question of whether a president should have to defend himself against a lawsuit while in office. They also agreed for the term that began Monday to review a case challenging the constitutionality of a federal handgun-registration law, no doubt in part because lower courts are divided about whether the law, which requires sheriffs to check a purchasers background, unconstitutionally burdens local officials. But the justices do not automatically take on all cases posing significant societal dilemmas. Last June, for example, they refused to hear one on the legality of college affirmative action programs. The case did not garner the four votes needed to accept a petition for review and to schedule oral arguments on it. Before those votes are cast in the closed-door session, however, a case must pass muster with several of the youngest, least experienced lawyers in America the 36 law clerks who serve the nine individual justices and who, in effect, are their staff for a term. These clerks, most often four to a justice, usually are recent law school graduates and typically the cream of their Ivy League schools. It is the clerks who first winnow the 7,000 or so annual petitions, settling on the select few that they believe the justices themselves should consider. There is no set number or quota for each weeks conference. With the clerks memos in hand and in the closed conference room, the justices summarily reject most of the appeals. They discuss petitions flagged by one or more of the justices. Then, according to justices public accounts over the years, they vote aloud, one at a time by seniority but starting with the chief justice. While the chief justice leads the meeting, the most junior justice, now Stephen G. Breyer makes handwritten notes that will be passed to a clerk for public announcement of disposition of petitions. Rehnquist is known for running a brisk session. Bam! Bam! Bam! one associate justice said in describing the groups swift disposition of cases. Among the richest sources of inside information about the court are the papers of the late Justice Thurgood Marshall (1967-1991). They describe negoti ations as cases moved through the process. They show, for example, that only by the bare minimum of four votes did the justices accept a case that eventually yielded an important 1990 ruling on religious freedom. As is his responsibility by tradition, Chief Justice Rehnquist laid out the facts of the case and lower court rulings on it: Two Native Americans had been fired from their jobs at a private drug rehabilitation center after ingesting peyote, a cactus that contains the hallucinogen mescaline, as part of an ancient Indian religious ceremony. The men were denied unemployment compensation by the state of Oregon because officials said they were fired for illegal conduct. State drug law prohibited use of peyote. The men were never charged with a crime, and they sued the state, contending that denial of unemployment compensation violated their right to religious freedom. The Oregon Supreme Court sided with them, ruling that the anti-drug statute should not outlaw religious use of p eyote. The state appealed to the Supreme Court. When the case first arrived here in 1987, Rehnquist voted to hear it. Next in seniority and entitled to the second vote was William J. Brennan Jr., who apparently was concerned that the high court might overturn the Oregon Supreme Court ruling and voted no. Next came Byron R. White, who voted yes, the second of four votes needed to accept. Marshall voted no. Harry A. Blackmun said he would vote yes if three other solid votes were committed to hearing it. This vote to join-3, as it is called, means that a justice is ambivalent but willing to vote yes if three colleagues want the case. Lewis F. Powell Jr., John Paul Stevens and Sandra Day OConnor voted no. Then it was time for the last and then-newest justice. Antonin Scalia voted to take the case, ensuring that with Blackmuns join-3 vote, the states appeal of an order that it must pay the men unemployment compensation would be reviewed. The case eventually would result in a decision aga inst the men. The justices overturned the state supreme court decision saying there is no violation of the First Amendment right of free exercise when a general state law incidentally infringes on religious practices. The majority opinion, written by Scalia, upset religious groups across the spectrum and prompted Congress in 1993 to pass legislation to reverse the rulings legal effects and enhance protection for minority religious practices. That effort marked one of the rare times that Congress successfully negated the effects of a court ruling by saying laws infringing on religious practices must meet a very strict compelling interest test. A few years earlier, Congress had failed to outlaw flag burning, which the Supreme Court had ruled was a form of free speech protected by the First Amendment. When Congress first responded, in 1989, by passing a law prohibiting flag desecration, the court ruled it unconstitutional. Then when Congress tried in 1990 to amend the Constitution, the effort never garnered the necessary two-thirds vote in the House and Senate. Cask Of Amontillado (1151 words) EssayGovernment Essays